NBA approves rule changes on coach's challenges, flopping.

Search

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
86,184
Tokens
LAS VEGAS -- The NBA's board of governors approved two rule changes that will go into effect next season -- a second coach's challenge if the first one is successful and an in-game flopping penalty -- at its annual meeting during the NBA 2K24 Summer League on Tuesday.
Both rule changes had been unanimously recommended to the board of governors by the league's competition committee -- a group made up of players, union representatives, coaches, governors, executives and referees -- to be implemented next season.
Coaches having access to a second challenge is something that teams -- and coaches, in particular -- have been pushing for years. Now, if a team gets a challenge correct earlier in a game, it will have a chance for a second one later in a contest.
But while teams will still retain the first timeout they have to use to call for the initial challenge, they will not get their timeout back for their second challenge -- even if it is successful.
Meanwhile, there will be a new rule implemented to try to curb instances of flopping in games. Now, when a referee calls a flop, there will be a non-unsportsmanlike technical foul called on the offending players' team, and the opposing team will get a free throw. Referees also won't have to stop play to call a flop, as they can wait until the next stop in live action, if needed, to make the call.
Possession will not change, however, and flopping violations can't be directly reviewed by a coach's challenge. They can, however, be added to a call during a review of a different play.
The league's preexisting postgame flop violation structure will stay in place, with the financial penalty having been changed to mirror that of technical fouls, with fines beginning at $2,000 and increasing for each repeated offense.
Flops called during games, however, will just result in a free throw for the other team.
The flopping rule change will be utilized on a one-year trial basis.
 

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2022
Messages
1,200
Tokens
What if a ref says it’s a flop when it’s not? Could they challenge that?
 

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
1,450
Tokens
Would rather them appoint a "czar" or "office" to deal with the flopping and to some extent technical fouls. NBA is fast and hard to officiate, why put so much on the refs in real time.

Flopping is learned over time by these players, they need to unlearn it.

Rather then breaking up the game flow even more with a tech free throw each team. Have the czar review any possible flops and access techs after the game. Then after a certain amount of violations you get suspensions without pay. Just like you can get suspended for verbally of physically abusing the refs, now if you purposly try to make the refs looks stupid you get suspended, no more BS.

Make harsh penalties, they will unlearn flopping really fast.

Same with techs as well. Draymond abuses the officials all game verbally but they only call 1 tech. The czar can go in after the game and add 3 more if needed.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
10,666
Tokens
Judgement calls…. I can’t see a challenge made on Judgement? My guess…

would rather see a $20,000 fine on the flop…..
 

Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!!!
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
21,407
Tokens
100k fine

lebron-james1.gif
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,115,461
Messages
13,524,345
Members
100,269
Latest member
blackrain
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com